Candice: Ok, so Phil’s done his research. Probably abit arse about face as we have already written the book, but its a good way to shape this group of 80,000 words into something that a nice publisher might like, based on his reading experience. However, there is something fundamental missing in his experience, he’s not a girl. I suspect that’s why ‘Cat’ went down better than ‘Flawless’, but that was part of the test.
I also liked ‘Cat’ more than ‘Flawless’, and I’m the audience I think we are aiming this book at. Not someone who wants soppy rubbish, but a woman with a brain who wants escapism but realism. As Neil has commented, people have real experience of the Tour de France, unlike the high flying world of gems and castles. None of us can understand that so its chance at grabbing us might fade. I suppose it’s also a bit like the programs I like to watch. Give me ‘Buffy’, ‘Lost Girl’ or ‘Fringe’, set in reality but with escapist moments, rather than ‘Star Trek’ which I have no interest in at all.
So where to now? Does Phil need to put on a dress and feel some relationship angst. Um, no, that’s why he’s part of this writing partnership because he brings the Male to FeMale. He’s the comedy buffer to my comments on shoes and handbags. Though he does like a good Peplum….
I feel that more research is never enough in this case. As you followers know I am always reading books, and each one helps to shape how I might approach our writing. But I still think we need to tackle the other two areas we have set ourselves: submission of short stories (one written and just needing final tweaks), and attending a writing group (mainly for research as I not sure it is our thing, too much navel gazing).
Now I have surfaced from under a few weeks madness at work its time to do the final polish on our horror short and get it sent. And maybe, if you guys are lucky, we might let you read it too…