All this is fine but it does create problems. For a start, what about people who don’t like your book? How is it to be bombarded by criticism?
You can say, “Well I don’t take it personally” but that’s got to be almost impossible.
The problem is the intermingling of public and private persona’s. Nowhere is this more of an issue than Facebook.
In my own field, I am mildly famous. I blog, I write for magazines, I turn up at exhibitions where people come and talk to me. All this is part of the job and absolutely marvellous.
But, because of this, lots of people have requested that they be my friend on Facebook. Currently there are 18 awaiting acceptance, none of whom I have met as far as I know. Once this started happening, I made a rule that if I don’t actually know you, I don’t accept you as a friend.
Facebook is where I keep in touch with friends and as I’m not a 12 year old girl, I don’t gauge my life by having a stupidly large number on-line. I like to think that everyone on that list is someone I could go for a drink with. Someone I actually remember meeting more than once for a start.
Those who randomly get in touch are probably lovely people but I can’t be sure they aren’t axe murderers. As such, I don’t want to accept them. Discussions, jokes and anything else shared on-line is to be shared with like-minded people, not just random bods who got in touch.
In the future though, is this going to be an option? Once The Book is published, how do we deal with all the people who will then want to be in touch?
Do we have two groups of people – real friends and professional friends (fans?) and do we both need two sets of personality on all social media to divide the two?
Is it time for Nolan Parker to become a real (virtual) person and sign up for Faceybook and Twittier?